Comparison

RewardBase vs Stickly

These two products are the same shape and almost the same price, and they disagree about exactly one thing: proof. RewardBase has your user submit a screenshot, a URL or a note, and you approve or reject it in a dashboard. Stickly has no submission and no queue — a click grants the credit. That single difference decides which one you want, and nothing else on this page matters as much.

Every figure on this page was read from rewardbase.app on 3 October 2026. Prices change — if something here is out of date, tell us and we will fix it.

Choose RewardBase if

  • You need evidence a task was done, and you are willing to review it.
  • Your rewards are large enough that someone would bother faking them.
  • You want more than one kind of reward — discount codes, access unlocks, a points wallet.
  • You are running one-off campaigns where a human eye on each entry is the point.

Choose Stickly if

  • You will not realistically keep up with an approval queue, and you know it.
  • Your rewards are small — a few credits — so the cost of a fake claim is a few credits.
  • You want the user rewarded the moment they act, not the next time you log in.
  • You pay in your own product’s credits and want nothing else in the loop.

Side by side

RewardBaseStickly
Proof of completionUser submits a screenshot, URL or text; you approve or reject itNone. A click grants the credit
Work per claim, for youOne review, every claimZero
Time to reward, for the userWhenever you next open the dashboardImmediate
Free tier100 participants / month1,000 participants / month
Reward typesCredits, discount codes, points wallet, access unlocks. Gift cards and bank payouts listed as coming soonYour own credits, one currency, nothing else
Program types available todayManual submissions. Their FAQ states in-app event tracking and referrals are still being built26 link task templates plus any custom URL
IdentityUser details passed at widget init, or an email + one-time-code fallbackA JWT you sign server-side on live keys; the user id never comes from the browser
Backend work to installNone required — the OTP fallback covers itYou must mint a signed token
Revenue shareNoneNone

The darker column in each row is the one we think wins it. Several of them are theirs.

Pricing

RewardBaseStickly
Free$0 — 100 participants / month$0 — 1,000 participants / month
Entry paid$19 / month — 1,000 participants$19 / month — 10,000 participants
Higher volume$29 / 2,500 · $49 / 5,000 · $99 / 10,000Included — Pro is 10,000 at $19
Lifetime$199 once$199 once — 10,000 participants

Where RewardBase is better

A comparison page with no section like this one is an advertisement. These are the places we would tell you to use them instead.

They can actually prove it happened

This is the real one. If you are paying $25 for a G2 review, the honour system is the wrong tool and RewardBase is the right one. Stickly has no answer here beyond "price the task so low that lying is not worth it" — which works for a $2 follow and does not work for a $25 review.

A wider reward menu

Discount codes, access unlocks and a points wallet are things Stickly deliberately does not have. We took one currency on purpose, and that cut is a limitation as much as it is a simplification.

No backend work to install

Their email-and-code fallback means a front-end developer can finish the integration alone. Stickly requires a signed token on live keys, which means touching your server. That is a deliberate trade — without verification, identity is the only thing stopping an unbounded credit mint — but it is more work.

Questions people actually ask

Is Stickly cheaper than RewardBase?
The headline numbers are the same — $19 a month, $199 for lifetime. The volume you get for them is not. RewardBase’s free tier is 100 participants a month and Stickly’s is 1,000; RewardBase’s $19 covers 1,000 and meters upward from there ($29 at 2,500, $49 at 5,000, $99 at 10,000), while Stickly’s $19 covers 10,000. Stickly bills in Indian rupees through Razorpay, which RewardBase does not.
Which one actually checks that a user followed you?
RewardBase, by having the user upload proof and having you look at it. Stickly does not check, and says so on its own pricing page. Neither of us can check automatically — no social platform exposes an API that would let anyone verify a follow or a star reliably, so the real choice is between a human review queue and no queue at all.
Can I move from one to the other?
Both are a script tag and a webhook, so the integration work is a day either way. The part that does not move is the history: claims and approvals live in whichever dashboard recorded them.
Does either take a cut of revenue?
No. Neither RewardBase nor Stickly charges a revenue share or a transaction fee. That is worth knowing because the referral tools people compare these against — Cello, PartnerStack, Rewardful — generally do.

Try it before you decide.

The free plan covers 1,000 participants a month and takes one script tag. That is a cheaper way to settle this than reading another comparison page.